Happy to debate, but no, hoppe’s argument is circular.
1. If we say an ethic of the should, then yes.
2. if we say an ethic of is, then no.
3. Hoppe states 1, but claims 2.
Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-11 22:01:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778544029317145025
Reply addressees: @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @StephaneGeyres @ViandeTiede666 @Cobra_FX_ @_ThDa @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @RageCultureMag @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778517026673160693
Leave a Reply