WHAT DOES SCIENCE MEAN AFTER ALL? Yes, tho wolfgang smith makes a common error o

WHAT DOES SCIENCE MEAN AFTER ALL?
Yes, tho wolfgang smith makes a common error of criticizing science that is common to both the theological and philosophical:
Science is just legal testimony to the evidence from our ancient law applied outside of the courtroom.
To claim what is testifiable is simply to seek the truth of cause and consequence independent of subjective experience of the individual(s)- thereby providing decidability in matters of agreement, disagreement or conflict across people of different subjective experiences.
As such, to say science falsifies claims of the testifiability of subjective experience as true, is not the same as saying subjective experience does not exist, nor that it has no influence over us, or meaning to us.

Reply addressees: @waynelforBernie