YES MORALITY IS DECIDABLE AND COMPUTABLE No. That would imply we all obey the sa

YES MORALITY IS DECIDABLE AND COMPUTABLE
No. That would imply we all obey the same rules, even though individual demand for terms of cooperation (what each person intuits is moral in his case) is universal rather than a reflection of his or her genetics, reproductive and cooperative value to others, and that races, ethnicities, states, and civilizations were equal in geographic, resource, and demographic composition, as well as threats from competitors.
I only said we can provide decidability into whether a conflict would be created by an act of irreciprocity.

I know that this is a complex issue that requires quite a bit of knowledge and some strict definition of terms. But yes, it is possible to measure whether an interaction consists of irreciprocal or reciprocal acts – and it’s not all that hard. In fact we have categorized over 130 questions. And we cannot find any moral question that is not decidable – even between groups.

That this is possible should be obvious given (a) the convergence of the sciences (b) the convergence of law (c) the convergence of economics.

I mean. the common law means ‘what we have found in common’. It’s the empirical evidence of what commonalities are found between different tribes and nations.

That decidability in those courts is reducible to tort (trespass). Cataloguing civilizational differences wasn’t even that difficult. The reason being there is a simple law of bias in three directions that all civilizations must choose in a priority. The the degree of homogeneity determines the completeness. Then the degree of development determines the flexibility to migrate toward individual choice and away from collective.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @Y_I_K_ES @GaryMarcus