It is impenetrable because it uses 1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of ter

It is impenetrable because it uses
1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of terms by enumeration, operationalism, adversarialism, and serialization into a system of unambiguous measurement of any concept into one or more causal relations.
2) Promissory, Operational, language, absent the verb to-be, as complete transactions, in complete sentences.
3) Constructed from the ternary logic of evolutionary computation (the first cause), into the first principles (laws of nature) at each scale of emergent combinations (disciplines).
There is more, but in general, math is just the most reductive deflationary language, and ordinary language is an efficient one, while storytelling ( loading, framing, obscuring), fictions, the fictionalisms, evasion, denial, projection, accusation, undermining, sedition, treason and warefare are inflationary, conflationary, deceptive, and evasive.
I have employed the largest group of library science people I know of, worked with one of the largest organizations in the world on their analysis, and myself worked in early AI, as well as my own work in computational linguistics.
What I learned most from, was anti-social behavior, lying, fraud, fictionalisms, and evasion – particularly sex differences in lying.
There is more information there in the via-negativa than there was in all the efforts at rationalizing language.
And the new LLMs are merely proving the point every single day now.
Morality is just physics over time.

Reply addressees: @privacyfocused @Y_I_K_ES @GaryMarcus