Marko,
Advice: If we enable rule of law by the natural law of self determination by universal mutual insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, where reciprocity includes the criteria “productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality” (causality) then we can only produce moral markets – or rather capitalism proper. If however, we choose any other definition of capitalism (the effect) we leave open the definition of capitalism and as such enable immoral involuntary transfers. In other words one can pursue anglo capitalism (rule of law producing moral markets) or (Rothbardian) jewish capitalism which produces immoral markets by permitting fraud, baiting into hazard, imposition of costs by externality. As such one benefits from explaining rule of law by natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity or markets that permit involuntary transfer, the externalization of risk, and baiting into hazard.
Reply addressees: @mmjukic @mr_scientism
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-16 23:08:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769138636115632129
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768347397896192487
Leave a Reply