Government needs a few tweaks, which in retrospect should have been obvious – I’

Government needs a few tweaks, which in retrospect should have been obvious – I’ve done the work and it’s rock solid science. Monarchies don’t need to govern any more than do judges. But in the end, given the universality of the failure of political systems due to incentives (read Burnham and Hoppe) we do require a judge of last resort that can if necessary replace a government failing the people. If we had a king right now we could sue as the founders did. But without a king we have only civil war. The english monarchy in the 20th has the correct rights and obligations under rule of law – they are above the law in restoration of the law. The problem is that they are afraid to use that power in the current postwar climate. In other words, without a monarchy you have no intergenerational defense of the people from what the left has done to us. And without a means by which the people can defend the monarchy they cannot exercise the power to defend us from the government.

Reply addressees: @TomKawczynski