–“What is this about?”–
In the abstract it is about (1) whether the people are sovereign or the state or the court (the people) (2) whether the natural law (reciprocity, tort, demonstrated interest, individual sovereignty) provides universal decidability (yes), (3) and whether the injection of jewish authoritarian legal thought (Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin, Hartt), like jewish marxist thought, can replace our 5000 years of sovereignty by demand for commonality in positiva legislation and concurrency in negativa findings of the court (no) (4) or whether we will continue the reforms started by Scalia to restore our law and our sovereignty, or whether the destruction of rule of law will continue just as the destruction of our culture, institutions, history, civilization, and frankly – genome – will succeed.
So it’s THE question. The rest is just noise.
Reply addressees: @Asha2044635 @FedSoc
Source date (UTC): 2024-02-21 19:17:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760383290303807488
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1760281458491457832
Leave a Reply