(Of course you are not. If you were it wouldn’t be instinct and intuition, but r

(Of course you are not. If you were it wouldn’t be instinct and intuition, but rational choice. It’s just that some of us, almost exclusively male, are biased to the truth (‘regardless of face and regardless of cost”) and we can’t find more than single digits of women who can. In fact, we can’t even find women who don’t fall for the Naxalt/Axalt fallacy (which you’ve already done a few times). Female empathizing is extremely useful at small scale. But it doesn’t scale. Male systematizing is exeptional at scale, but such generalizations are not always applicable to the individual case. So men and wome are complimentary. But we are very different. and the degree to which we are different is far more so than we’d assumed, even before the marxist-feminist pseudoscientific attempt to claim otherwise. )

Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy