In general yes. His insight that kings are owners and politicians are renters, and that this is an inevitable and exceptionaless consequence is correct.
However, instead of natural law, anglo law, and science, Hoppe uses marxist argument, and jewish ethics and seeks to replicate the german free cities – which isn’t possible.
However his resulting method of logic – propertarian as it is, reducing all questions of social science to question of property (even if it’s the wrong defintion of property: intersubjective vs demonstrated interest) is a profound insight, and he’s the thinker I took it from and developed.
I wouldn’t have solved the problems I did without his insights. And to some degree his humor and charming personality which I find wonderful.
(Even though he doesn’t care for me very much… 😉 )
Reply addressees: @d4n_m4d3r1a
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:40:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750997142338965504
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750995690191458387
Leave a Reply