Again, not an argument. Evidence of lack of one. Attempt at redirection. Both ev

Again, not an argument. Evidence of lack of one. Attempt at redirection. Both evidence of intellectual dishonesty and attempted deception. In addition, either your accusation is substantive or it is not. If it is, you should be capable of defining Natural Law as you understand it, and explaining how my work is “antithetical in spirit and substance”. That would constitute an argument. Are you able? Or will you continue your pretense, dishonesty, and schoolgirl ad hominem as an evasion of that inability to make an argument?

I find you and your ilk childish examples of infantilized males demonstrating their immaturity – and often because they overly trained by women not men.

Reply addressees: @DouglasGOsborne @TuckerCarlson