THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG” While we humans favor discovering what works

THE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR “WRONG”
While we humans favor discovering what works, and so we try to emphasize innovative discoveries, the path to discover those innovations is a record of failures.

In my work operationalizing the sciences, I’ve found that most of my insights come from a consistent source:
1) The tendency of all thinkers across the spectrum to opine and discuss matters beyond their field of competency and into the broader field of incompetency.
2) The observation of the market competition between between these mistakes, biases, errors and falsehoods.
3) The ease at discovering the ‘coincidences of wrongs’ suggesting what cognitive errors the individuals are making.
4) The correction of the cognitive errors, and how that changes how one can interpret the sources upon which they have based these errors.

This strategy requires largely that one have a fairly accurate epistemology and a fairly accurate understanding of the simplicity of the Ternary Logic of the universe. But more importantly, that one develops an intuition for the consistency of the spectrum of biases, mistakes, errors, and frankly, self and other deceits, that humans are want to engage in. My work has quite by accident resulted in a deep study of human ignorance error bias and deceit.

So there is value in the market for ‘wrongs’. Not only in assisting in discovering ‘rights’, but in discovering the behavior of mankind in the production of wrongs and rights further advising us on the production of more rights than wrongs. 😉

Cheers
-CD