The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation Where the previous milennias a

The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation

Where the previous milennias asked this question:
–“To summarize: Classical natural law theory can be understood as a commitment to the following two claims: (1) Moral validity is a logically necessary condition for legal validity—an unjust or immoral law being no law at all; and (2) The moral order is a part of the natural order-moral duties being in some sense ”read off” from essences or purposes fixed (perhaps by God) in nature.”–

Instead, our construction is quite simple:
The only reason for I and mine not to kill you and take your Stuff, is if there is more utility than doing so. And the only means of obtaining that utility is cooperation. And the terms of that cooperation are reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means in the form of sovereignty in demonstrated interest and reciprocity in display word and deed. Only then does a ‘we’ exist, instead of an ‘I’. In other worse, this is the means by which commons are produced, and commons are a multiplier, and it is commons that defend us against the dark forces of time, nature, man, and ignorance.