I do not deny other modes of thought, any more than I deny the grammars we use to explain them to one another. My job however is decidability, decidability applied to law, and law applied to bring about as close a condition of Natural Law as possible, so that we all may cooperate while minimizing conflict, even if we are maximizig competition, the result of which is
So I am not an advisor (philosopher). I am a judge(jurist). I leave the choices to you as long as that choice does not include harm to others despite that you feel you are doing good – and are just wrong. 😉
When you are wrong and cause harm then is when we resolve conflicts between percieved goods, that are not goods but errors or crimes. 😉
Reply addressees: @artus9010 @riboster @AEemus @dr_duchesne
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 17:00:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745128487764041728
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745127301442924851
Leave a Reply