“Q: What changes in the law caused the 1960s cultural revolution?”–Bob FAILURE

—“Q: What changes in the law caused the 1960s cultural revolution?”–Bob

FAILURE TO UPDATE THE LAW NOT CHANGES IN THE LAW
The changes in the law were a consequence not a cause. Instead, it was a failure of the 20th century legislative process to carry forward prohibitions within the common law to the federal code – something I have addressed elsewhere: the feminine cognition driving the left was prohibited or at least contained during the pre-industrial period.

And it was a widespred presumption, almost across the populations f the west that the end of scarcity had arrived, and therfore our self regulation had ended, and the horn of conucopia of endless growth hand fallen from the heavens into our lap.

So instead, the “revolt” against culture in the 1960s was the result of an overlapping sequence of factors as the global (Jewish) left recognized the failure of class marxism and sought power by other means.

CAUSALITY
(a) the left’s migration from europe to the states, and conversion of their objective from fomenting class conflict by false accusatino of oppression (rather than domestication) and instead shift to culture, then race and sex marxism to pursue power by fomenting those conflicts by false accusation of oppression (rather than soft domestication.)

(b) The unification of feminine christian optimistic but scientific progressivism combining darwin, malthus, and s spencer with new economic possibility, with jewish pessimistic and pseudoscientific revolt against darwin malthus and in particular the eugenics of the progressives.

(c) The success at their capture of academy and education, with the specific intention to destroy western civilization by the “march through the institutions of western cultural production, beginning with education, media, finance, then government.”

(d) The postwar shift to credentialist (managerial) state instead of demonstrated competency in miltary and industry. This put ideology rather than evidence and ended loyalty and replaced it with undermining (sedition).

RESOURCES FOR THE LEFT TO EXPLOIT
(e) The postwar baby boom, especially among the lower classes caused a demographic shift in the composition of the values and skills and knowledge of the electorate.

(f) the economic shift of the lower clases into lower middle economies and some middle class employment, made possible only by the rest of the world’s economic capacity being decimated by the war (which ended by 1972) such that the lower classes had sufficient economic influence and political influence that the new communications methods could be use to easily influence them – because they were not yet inculcated into middle class ethics of the american, anglo, and western tradition.

(g) the introgression of women in to both the voting pool and the economy, when women are vulnerable to the Neo-Marxist, Postmoder, Feminist, Race Marxist (now Woke) false promises and false claims of oppression – a behavior which is the only terms underwhich the feminine mind feels comfortable in non-conformity and aggression.

(h) the failure of the movement to purge the country of the communists, socialists, and broader leftists during the late 1940s to the mid-1950s McCarthy era – which had it been successful would have prevented the 1960s. This was a catastrophic failure that will cause us to have much worse purges in the future all across western civilization.

LEGAL DEVOLUTIONS THAT THE LEFT COULD EXPLOIT
(i) Loosening moral laws (‘blue laws). The widespread availability of i. the pill, ii. abortions, iii. no fault divorce, iv. easy credit (debt), v. radio, television, newspaper and magazine advertising that appeal to female demands for hyperconsumption and hypergamy, vi. deprecation of our prohibitions on ‘baiting people into those moral hazards’.

(j) The immigration act of 68 whose vast amplification of the “underclassing” and “feminizing” of american, anglo, germanic, western, european masculine “maximization of individual rsponsibility for self, private, and common” such that we make the production of high trust low cost commons possible, such that the need for income by each family is decreased in order to obtain the same quality of life.

CURRENT CONSEQUENCE
(k) the feminiization of institutions of education, government and media, and the continous decline in business and industry and the resulting infantilization of the population and loss of competitiveness worldwide.

Those causes (a) thru (j) are causal. All the events during the sixties are simply an expression of this underlying causeality.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @BOB37702515 @AutistocratMS