You’re a good person. You speak from a moral disposition. I don’t really want to

You’re a good person. You speak from a moral disposition. I don’t really want to argue with good people who depend on the faith.

FWIW: I only claim to what I can testify to – evolutionary computation at all scales of existence. You cannot, no one can, testify to statements of faith. You must lie o say so. Ergo, I make only those claims I can testify to and do not take a position on the constitution of god only of the evidnce of god’s word and deed if one does exist.

I other words, my (our) position is that if we all obey the natural law of coopration we will act as morally as is possible with as little chance of error. Why we justify that natural law as divine intention or deterministic necssity is irrelevant.

All that matters then is whether I would spa and act as morally more morally or lss moraly than you at all scales. While we might differ in our moral criteria for individual interactions, I suspect this is due to greater knowledge on my part – but that the difference might be minimal. Furthermore, I suspect that I would act more morally at large scales since that is the primary difference conveyd by ability.

Reply addressees: @BOB37702515 @hawkevick @CuriousKonkie