Kate do you know the standing criticisms of the pseudoscience of freud, boaz, go

Kate do you know the standing criticisms of the pseudoscience of freud, boaz, gould? Why we developed cognitive science, behavioral econ, and why econ has dominated social science and soft sciencs claim it as “economic imperialism”? Do you know any behavioral econ? Any cognitive science at all? Any linguistic analysis? Sex differnces in lying or even what are perceived as lying? Any sex differences in, say, mathmatical reasoning? Neurological basis of sex differences in morals, personality facets, intelligence, hemispheric relations and spcializations? Any neuroscience? Any in utero neurological development? Any operational genetics?

I dont know when and where you we educated but you have a populist understanding of the subjects you’re discussing in a field that is ground zero in the replication crisis via unscientific methods and projection of priors, given the selection bias into the field. And you demonstate this in your use of loaded terms, and worse, in the bias dependence of correlations over causations – when you appear absent knowledge of causality. Even worse I am confident that you can’t enumerate female antisocial behaviors as you may the male inversions of them and would be horrified to learn behaviors you yourself justify as a good are in fact antisocial and criminal behaviors.

The fellows you are exchanging with do not know these things so neither of you is making much sense given the higher resolution necssary to clarify either position.

Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @NWEurasian @StephenThomasHC @AutistocratMS


Source date (UTC): 2023-12-24 07:47:27 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738828719043620864

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1738821669559341197

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *