You don’t know this but I don’t say anything unless the data says so, and when I

You don’t know this but I don’t say anything unless the data says so, and when I am skeptical or questioning I say so. And when I err I apologize. And FWIW I have an intimidating reputation for insight and prediction. Even in my work most intellectuals in history produce only one or two innovations – and I passed that quite a few years ago.

So, of course I can back it up. But I don’t and won’t respond to accusations instead of intellectually honest questions starting from a position of seeking to understand.

However, since you’re new, look at the research on how conservatives understand progressives, and how women think only of themselves (and their children) and other women but otherwise don’t think of men at all, and can’t even begin to empathize with them at all.

I just explain why it’s so, with the neurological evidence of empathizing in time vs systematizing over time, combined with cognitive and moral specialization in harm/care and equality instead of proportionality and can’t even conceive of the rest. Whereas conservatives (cognitively male men in particular do not specialize but weigh each moral foundation (really, capital responsibility) about equally.

I mean, we can scan brains now, and even at current levels of resolution, and frames per second, determine the sex and the race of the individual.

Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice