WHAT DO WE DO WITHOUT A SUPERNATURAL CHURCH? Yes. And if you were unlucky enough

WHAT DO WE DO WITHOUT A SUPERNATURAL CHURCH?
Yes. And if you were unlucky enough to follow me for any period of time 😉 you would have noticed that I criticize churchianity across time, and the criticize Church after Aquinas less, and only substantially in the time of Darwin for not totally converting to natural law, and claiming the church had been correct all along – at least metaphorically – the science had demonstrated so.

We can’t practice faith any longer. Or rather, the capacity to hold faith in the supernatural. We can have belief and confidence in the evidence of the hand of a creator and that science seeks the laws of that creator. and then have faith in a creator that we CAN never know anything about other than what he has left for us to discover in the laws of the universe, and in my work, our organizatin’s work, the natural law of cooperation.

Now, while that approach is effectively deism. And while we have the hero of jesus and the saints on one hand, and many heroes of military, arts, and science on the other, we still need rituals that Church provided us.

Stoicism (masculine) and Epicureanism (Feminine) provide the training and environment for the non-false indoctrination into the mindfulness that the church and social construction of the experience of church, provided.

We have a Solution to religion and it’s not false.

We may need then the fundamental supernatural, the deist and philosophical , and the wonderous and scientific unified under natural law of cooperation to reproduce the moral training that we all require (obviously).

The question is only the institution to do so. I feel teh churches will continue to collapse until some churches, perhaps the catholic that is already exceptional at it, and the state can unite in producing an education system that trains the whole person.

Is that still a church? Is it an academy? I don’t know. I know that science, philosophy, religion, and military service have been unified. Does that mean we should unify the teachings of them?

It surely seems so.

-Curt

Reply addressees: @MeMawChatterBox