I am correct. You are trying to preserve the opportunity for false testimony and

I am correct. You are trying to preserve the opportunity for false testimony and false claims as a means of resistance against testifiable truth despite the evidence that all incdreases in knowledge eliminate ignorane error bias and deceit, yet all religions spread ignorance, eror, bias and deceit. The abrahamic religions most of all, because they make the most false claims, with the must fundamentalist foundations.
I do not have ‘faith’ or ‘belief’ which would require I hold a prior and justify it. Instead I have a lack of confidence, confidence, or certainty that I can testify to within the limits of the demand for infallibility in the context in question.
This level of thinking is very difficult for those who are indoctrinated into the falsehood of justificationism which all of religion and most of philosophy is dependent upon. But which, we have learned, is simply false. All logic is falsificationary. Therefore all we can testify to is that which survives adversarial competition.
I have no reason to hold confidencde in anything other than the explicability of the entirety of the universe, becuase every time humans invent an attempt to claim so we have been wrong. EVERY SINGLE TIME.
As such, you are lying. Because you are not, and cannot testify to either confidence, or certainty, in the probability of an alternative to explicability given the simplicity of the laws of the universe: “Evolutionary computation of persistence by Continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy (disorder) in to negative entropy (order) we call mass.

Reply addressees: @HakunaMateria