Middle eastern history is quite simple. It’s a mall that intersects the “four co

Middle eastern history is quite simple.
It’s a mall that intersects the “four contients” (europe,asia, india, and africa) and four races, and it has the fertile crescent for africa and the middle east, and india has her major rivers and china has hers. SO there was the possibility of food sufficient for producing specialists. And specialized producing goods and services for trade.

But middle eastern history conists of one tribe conquering a region, then building an economy, the anothe tribe conquering them and this process repeated throughout all of history until the Europeans, the Indians and the Chinese basically cut them off with the age of sail,ending the utility of the silk road, as well as the geography of the ‘mall’, and then walled them in with the agrairan-to-industrial revolutions.

So MENA never developed nationalism, the nation state, high trust peoples, rule of law and trade. Becaue they cannot cooperate at scale, because theiving cheating corruption and ‘getting it first before someone else does’ is their ethical foundation. So they developed the opposite – the only strategy possible – the stragey of women: undermining.