So (a) I dispute the point (b) I addressed the point correctly the first time, (

So (a) I dispute the point (b) I addressed the point correctly the first time, (c) so now i’ve thorougly addressed the point inescapably, and (d) in doing so demonstrated that I do not hold amaturish beliefs based on limited knowledge as you do, but that I disagreed becasue you were simply absurdly wrong, because as I argued you have a comic book understanding of these matters.

You could have answered this question by a set of google queries, rather than assuming your ‘impressions’ are true. Instead you wasted my time.

When someone like me deigns to interact with you then at least have the good grace to ask questions and seek to understand rather than assume you have even the vaguest idea what you’re talking about.

You’re welcome.

Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga