That’s not true. It’s underclass priestly ethics of non aggression and non-respo

That’s not true. It’s underclass priestly ethics of non aggression and non-responsibilty for the commons, including the non responsibility of the ethics of the bazaar. It’s why islam can’t form corporations of scale or governments because it’s the lowest trust civilization outside of africa. Why are muslims untrustworthy? Why does barter survive instead pricing? Why are the militaries and governments so corrupt? Why do you need an authoritarian religion and an authoritarian goverment if you are moral and cooperative and can produce commons? Why are you so petty about insulting truths?

This difference between aristocracy and priesthood has always been true. Read “Hermes and the cart of lies” for the ancient version, or read the CIA’s Advice on working with muslims, or read the many papers on cultural differences in negotiation and contract. So, you’re confusing priesthood and the ethics of irresponsible slaves with aristocracy and the responsibility for the commons. You defend your irresponsibilty.

WE have the principle of noblesse oblige. (i’m a product of it) But our objective is to produce peers (an aristocracy of everyone) who can bear responsibility both for private and common. That’s not what judaism or islam seek.

I don’t like handing out painful truths about islam any more than I do about christianty, judaism, european civ, and americans. But we only learn the truth by comparaitive falsification.

But we have to end our falsehoods if we are to cooperate without conflict.