NEW RELIGION: MAKE MYSTICISM GREAT AGAIN? (NOPE) Zero chance. At present two thi

NEW RELIGION: MAKE MYSTICISM GREAT AGAIN? (NOPE)
Zero chance. At present two things are required for faith in traditional religion: 1) family indoctrination 2) empathic personality (feminine). These are amplified by 3) Status Insecurity.

The correct incentive is the Anglicans (CofE), which is, that it’s for the purpose of raising moral and psychologically healthy children and adults can otherwise ‘go their own way’.

Meaning all that matters is that as children they were taught christian morality. If they grow up atheist, agnostic, traditionalist, or devoted, is immaterial to the church and its mission. They have produced the desired output: ethical and moral behavior.

The orthodox church (unlike catholic or protestant) is apolitical so it’s doing a better job at retaining focus on the family. There is a need for behavioral indoctrination into mindfulness by scientific means – ie: without nonsense. (japanese , korean, chinese social saturation method is also an alternative).

Stoicism is just lifetime cognitive behavioral therapy but it is not as socially reinforcing. Epicureans provided the social reinforcement and that’s why they evolved into monsasteries under the christian conquest.

Chrsitianity is a feminine religion. But we managed to germanize it enough when combined with the martial aristocracy. But it’s not survivable in its current form without another reformation.

Same for Islam. Though islam is a low-IQ religion and it may persist in that frame. But devout christianity is far better for africa than islam and that’s obvious.

Reply addressees: @nym0_speaks @_MrNational