IS CHRISTIANITY THE FOUNDATION OF WOKE? (More correctly, it is the feminine > Je

IS CHRISTIANITY THE FOUNDATION OF WOKE?
(More correctly, it is the feminine > Jewish Abrahamic> Marxist-to-woke evolution of warfare by social construction from within – war by feminine sedition.)

Correct interpretation:
The woke movement (race Marxism) is the product of the following sequence of seditious movements:

1. Female Instinct: The female means of warfare by undermining using social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe under claims of plausible deniability of innocence, by blaming people, particularly men, and mainly European aristocracy, for the consequences of genetic differences between the sexes, classes, and populations – as oppression. Sexes differ not only in our means of warfare (men direct, physical, and political vs women indirect, verbal, and social).

2. Abrahamic Sequence: The Jewish separatist revolt against the aristocratic peoples (the indo-european spectrum on the one hand and their ‘trainers’ the Egyptians on the other) adopted the feminine strategy, and over time, especially in response to their defeat, dislocation, and conquest, this evolved into the sequence of abrahamic religions: a slave revolt – which is why they used the symbol of the cross. The sequence is an application of the social construction of the female false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe – resulting in the dark ages in Europe and the destruction and reduction to ashes by the Muslims of every great civilization of the ancient world other than China, and nearly India.

3. Marxist Sequence: The Jewish separatist revolt by the reformation of supernatural, theological religion into pseudoscientific and ideological marxist to woke sequence of cults – again, the social construction of a fraud, promising freedom from the laws of the universe: scarcity, self-interest, and natural selection – as well as the means of describing those laws: testimonial truth and logical consistency.

Abrahamic Synthesis of Sex Differences in Deception
The abrahamic invention that took place after the Roman conquest, resulting in Christianity and rabbinical Judaism, and only later that heresy of Christianity we call Islam – was the product of an innovation in lying that is horrific in consequence, even if fascinating in technical analysis.

The Jewish people are not innovators in other than what we call ‘mythicism’ but should be translated as storytelling or historical revisionism, which attempts to seduce by suspension of disbelief into an empathic agreement on “feels”, instead of a systematic agreement on “reals” (truth). A deception that is the polar opposite of the European male method of testimony and systematizing or what originated as ‘military reporting, court testimony, and eventually confession’, creating the unique Western tradition of truth before face regardless of cost – as well as our ability to invent reason, logic, empiricism, science.

So the unification of the feminine means of seduction, deception, storytelling mythicism, loading, framing, suggestion, and obscurantism, with the masculine European system of systematizing was as great an innovation in lying as the European sequence of reason-to-science was an innnovation in testimonial truth.

The Seditious Sequence of Feminine-Abrahamic War:
Marxist(LowerClassMarxism) >
… NeoMarxist(CulturalMarxism) >
… … Postmodern(TruthMarxism) >
… … … Trotsky-NeoConservatism >
… … … … Feminism(SexMarxism) >
.. … … … … Libertarian(MiddleClassMarxism) >
… … … … … … Friere’s-Woke (EducationalMarxism) >
… … … … … … … PC-Woke(Race Marxism)

Sedition and Treason:
Using Feminine > Abrahamic > Marxist Warfare by Fraud. Or what we technically refer to as seduction into the false promise of freedom from the four sets of laws of the universe, by the accusation of men as oppressors instead of their DOMESTICATORS and CIVILIZERS, hiding under the moral pretense of plausible deniability that their actions are moral rather than seditious warfare that spreads the feminine instinct of irresponsibility for the commons, such that it overwhelms the incentive for men to take responsibility for the commons – and therefore build civilization.

Sex Differences:
The male form of warfare is bad and recoverable. The feminine method of warfare is evil and unrecoverable. Hence the historical reputation of, and treatment of women.

The Undoing of our Compromise Between the Sexes
And the left and the feminists have just undone two thousand years of our efforts to domesticate women into civilization such that we could reverse the historical understanding and universal perception of women as childish, impulsive, shallow, greedy, hyper-consumptive, attention-seeking, disloyal, seditious, treasonous, harpies and wh–res for whom Pandora was but a gentle reflection – that men must protect society against by constraining women from public exercise of their natural, almost universally uncontrollable, criminality if not constrained by social pressures to domesticate and limit them.

Audience
I cannot control for the IQ and knowledge of my readers, so I can only hope to educate those who have the ability and knowledge to recognize the patterns of causality across the sciences and history I explain to them. That said, I can claim with certainty that this string of causality is the most parsimonious, accurate, explanatory power available now or ever. In other words, this is the science of the evolution of the institutionalization of deception using the feminine means of sedition. I can likewise explain the same arc of male deception. Which is boring by comparison. 😉

I usually end with ‘cheers’, but there is nothing to cheer here.

Sincerely

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation