YES, JEWS DID IT ON PURPOSE, AND SO DID EUROPEANS – AND EVERYONE ELSE FOR THAT M

YES, JEWS DID IT ON PURPOSE, AND SO DID EUROPEANS – AND EVERYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER
We had our period of supremacy, and they, especially since their enfranchisement, are having theirs.

You know I had a great conversation about this with Rabbi Daneil Lapin, who I personally love very much as a human being as well as a Rabbi and moral man. He said “There are good jews and bad jews, good christians and bad christians, good muslims and bad muslims.” We must work with the good and constrain the bad. And this is my position as well.

I want to fix the problem for us and for them. I can’t fix their past. I can’t fix our colonial past. I can’t fix the horrors that are endless in the muslim and chinese past, or the africans occurring today.. And I can’t even fix the relative absence of badness in indian civilization’s past so that they didn’t stagnate, and weren’t at this moment trending toward recidivism into their over the top mystical religion.

So while you and many like you seem to need your anger and retribution, I’ve had it, and given it up, so that I focus on fixing the problem forever. And I think I have.

Now, the evidence is that the feminine cognition, brain organization, and incentives of the ashkenazi remains consistent, even despite outbreeding, and that like women they will always pursue their instincts unless we encode the problem with their instincts for seduction (responsibility evasion, baiting into hazard, undermining and sedition) – like our instincts for conquest and domestication for profit – in the foundations of our laws, so that neither the male nor the female can pursue it’s extreme intuitions, and then perhaps we can avoid this problem and domesticate the jews as we have ourselves over time – and in doing so take advantage of their verbal acutiy by putting it to less harmful use.

What I’ll say that’s disturbing, is that we could have stopped this behavior if it weren’t for women’s enfranchisement and vulnerability to it. And if not for the greed of our people going along with it when it suited them. There are moral men among us, particularly among the english tradition who understood, and documented these issues thoroughly, but control of the purse buys the juriy no matter how large or small. The only cure is the intolerance of the law, the citizenry, the sheriffs, and the courts for the behavior.

And we must admit that we have allowed the legal positivists to deprive us of those protections of the common law, that ensureed those people an institutions were available to use for the suppression of this criminality. We have been disintermediated from our court of common law by design, and by the greed of the state for taxes, and the elites for rent seeking, and profits from abuse of our people.

I’ve done the work to fix the problem peacefully, if not happily for all, by ending financialization and financial manipulation, limiting us all to open reciprocal exchanges that are transparent. This ends the ability to bait into hazard favored as occupations in the jewish culture, and hopefully redirects them to more productive ends. But it ends the ability of our women, and the men who happily defect and manipulate those women, as well.

I should note that ashkenazi amorality (or immorality if you choose) in such matters, is as advantagous as western man’s advantage for our benevolet sociopathy in such matters: business, finance, and government. Because what is counter intuitive to many, (not me), is that when you work at very large scale, there is a tendency of minor goods and bads to average out as overall goods. And this often takes a more pragmatic mind, with more empirical judgement. And this is why askenazi jews that do not share our morals of the commons in finance and european “benevolent” sociopaths in business and industry are often successful at their duties. IN many cases the externalities are good.

So while you may want me to share in your emotions (which I consider an immature and feminine demand by the way), I don’t. I merely want to solve the problem, worked to solve the problem, and we are switching from research and development to activism so that we do solve the problem.

Doing is more important than feeling. 😉

-Hugs brother.

Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14 @BasedLawyer