It’s not. It’s to produce more kids in general with more frequency. The homosexu

It’s not. It’s to produce more kids in general with more frequency. The homosexual boys are just an artifact of her behavior. No different from losing x number of children in childhood which historically is about half. Makes absurdly obvious sense. Our modern presumption is false that so many child live. But historically on average about a third of men reproduce, and about half of children die before reproduction. So one gay son is a statistical irrelevance.

Reply addressees: @Nevertaken4 @JayMan471