Not an argument.
We have, I have, tried to test your ability to operationalize and generalize your limited frame of understanding into the universal paradigm and you have evaded every single attempt. And you do not even vaguely comprehend basic concepts of cognitive science, linguistics, logics, and how each paradigm and grammar is just another system of measurement, because all language consists of nothing but measurements, and all vocabulary within all paradigms varies only by the dimensions permissible in that paradigm. Thats before we even address epistemology. I can’t even get within driving distance of that subject with you.
I mean I began my work on the grammars with the foundations of mathematics because it is a trivial and well understood paradigm and grammar. But you seem totally incapable of generalizing mathematics into language and even vaguely comprehending what is expressible or not and continuous and therefore reducible and predictable or not.
Now I’m fairly patient and Socratic but I can easily recognize when someone is being stubborn, childish, and evasive. You clearly have no substantive knowledge of the history of mathematics and the last century’s attempt to save it, and formal logic that tries to imitate it. You don’t appear to have knowledge of the difference between expressions and algorithms, And are unaware of the differences in expressibility between continuous mathematical prose and discrete computatioanl operations. Or that for example, the numerical basis of computers was an arbitrary economic choice despite the argument that they should be entirely logical. In my judgment you’re effectively illiterate outside of your narrow window of craftsmanship.
But it takes me a while to distinguish between that personality flaw and one’s ability to abstract and generalized or disambiguation and operationalize a given subject. And even your frustration is difficult to determine if it’s emotional and petty or if you really are unable to grasp what others do with relative ease. But I did make the effort and give you the benefit of the doubt.
Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 08:47:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697531512818745344
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697521604643934476
Leave a Reply