Named Sequence (sequence space) Positional Name Scale: {0, 1, 2, 3….} Cooperat

Named Sequence (sequence space)
Positional Name Scale: {0, 1, 2, 3….}
Cooperative Name scale: { Evil, Immoral, Unethical, Amoral, Ethical, Moral, Virtuous }
Temporal Name scale: {Past, Recently, Present, Soon, Future}
etc.
What is the difference in disambiguation produced by different dimensions of different systems of names? Nothing.
All language consists of continuous recursive disambiguation of incomprehensibility into parsimonious consistency and correspondence, by adversarial competition between dimensions for (falsification) of alternative episodes (results).
ie: all logic is falsificationary.
The hierarchy of certainty is incomprehensible > uncertainty > undecidability > possibly true> false.
Language consists of three sets of names: nouns(references), verbs(operations), and agreements.
Nouns and verbs tend to average seven or so dimensions. Agreements/Non tend to have three dimensions yes/no/uncertain.
Math is just another language of increasing dimensions.
counting > arithmetic > algebra > geometry > calculus > statistics > discrete mathematics > combinatorics etc.
Episodic memories produced of language are natural while mathematical constructions must be trained into memory such that they form episodic memories.
All memories consist of fragments organized into episodes, which form the indexes of association from which we construct memories, reconstruct them, and form auto association between them.
The question is only what can be described with the language we use?

Reply addressees: @Ket_Math_Dad @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @WerrellBradley @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad