UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Le

UNDERSTANDING THE 20TH CENTURY POLITICAL EXPERIMENTS (Law, Socialism, Maxism, Leninism, Fascism)

All,
When we discuss the evolution of experiments with organizing humans in modernity, we would be better off discussing the specific approaches used and the influences that caused them to make the PRACTICAL decisions each country and group made.

The English invention of the empirical rule of law modern state, and it’s commercial rather than religious, social, or political organization, and the equality of opportunity, given the higher trust of the english people and the maturity of their institutions, as a continuation of the domeestic practice of the englis as they expanded in the age of sail. And the american order is simply a textual formalization of the english order.
(‘A Legal Order’)

The French Socialist philosophical invention of the origional meaning of socialism, meaning the organization of the administrative state for the benefit of the people rather than the aristocracy nobility and burghers, and the mediation of inequality of outcome, given the lower trust of the french people, their greater heterogeneity, with france being the most politically backward state in europe – and as a european reformationary movement.
(‘A Bureaucratic Order’)

The Marxist pseudoscientific distortion of socialism to the centralized state control of production and the equality of outcome, given the zero trust of the jews and underclasses, the total absence of experience with governance or rule, in fact the long history of jewis incompetence at rule, and even their inability to subsist non-parasitically with host populations, and especially total lack of exeperience with the behavior of human beings at scale – as an international revolutionary movement.
(a ‘Social Order’)

The Leninist ideological distortion of french -> marxist socialism given the zero trust of the jews and lower classes, the total inexperence of with governance and rule, the primitive agrarian state of development, and the acknowledgement of the demonstrated behavior of people at scale.
(a ‘Military Order’)

The Fascist ideological counter-revolution against the English Legal, French ‘Liberal’, and Jewish Marxist, and Russian Leninist alternatives. Given the high trust and sense of duty and piety of the german people given that they were surrounded, that france had destroyed the holy roman empire,
(a ‘Pseudo-Monarchical Order’)

Tip: The English were right on the seas where they were dominant and secure. The Fascists were right on the continent where they were surrounded and insecure. Everyone else was wrong. Because socialism, marxism, leninism, maoism, the jews, and the laggarts we call the muslim fundamentalists were all wrong.

Why? every polity doubles down on it’s group strategy like a drug addict until they crash hard enough that they need to reform.

Europeans are misunderstood: we crashed and reformed often and quickly and in doing so, despite being the youngest race, the young civilization, with small numbers, at the edge of the bronze age revolution, by the accident of the only possible means of organizing clans of steppe herders competing with horse, bronze, and wheel: rule of law and democratic choice.

In other words, the government of cattle raiders, of marines(rome), of vikings, of pirates, and of diasporic naval conquerors, whether land or sea, is the origion of sovereignty, the origin participatory government, the origin of rule of law, the origin of contractual legislation, and subsequently the origion of reason, philosophy, natural philosophy, empiricism, and science, and the fact that in just three short periods in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, europeans almost excluslively, and faster than all other civilizations combined, dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the victimization by a nature hostile to our existence.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @MadsMikkel28560 @Viorp2 @Thedukeistheman @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad