The absence of the monarchy would have no impact on that whatsoever. You’d have

The absence of the monarchy would have no impact on that whatsoever. You’d have to be absolutely ignorant of basic economies to think so. There is always a pretense that if X isn’t done then Y can be instead, and this is the silly game silly people play in their heads, without imagining that the government has to find an agreement between the many different x’s and y’s.

Now, in reality,why does she have children if that’s her condition other than her own irresponsibility, and exporting of her bad behavior, bad decisions onto the public? Why is it that the productivity outside of London has cratered? Why is it as someone who acquired companies around the world had so much trouble finding a company in the UK where people worked a full day, and took responsibility for producing what the job required? WHy are you letting the capital of the country be sold off to foreigners and immigrants at the expense of the wages and the living standard of the people, so that the government bureaucracy and financial sector can profit at the people’s expense?

Blaming the monarchy just means you’re a sucker for propaganda by the enemy of your people.

Reply addressees: @dnstewart67 @BladeoftheS