That’s a mistake. It’s the absence of prohibitons on labor arbitrage at the cost

That’s a mistake. It’s the absence of prohibitons on labor arbitrage at the cost of employment causing internal asymmetry of rewards (which may require some explanation if you aren’t educated in economics.)

Unions are one thing. Coercieve unions are yet another. Coercive unions that apply political pressure under democratic participation are even worse. Export of production means export of labor, means elimination of the power of unions, union corruption, and state use of coercion as a result.

That’s a simple example of the absence or rule of law (of natural law) and what we call ‘full accounting’. The result of rule of law of natural law under full accounting is just ‘moral capitalism’.

This is a relatively simple problem to fix. But creating ideological positions under democratic competition merely exacerbates the ignorance of the population by converting a practical institutional practice of maintaining rule of law of the natural law, as we do in many other aspects of life, to a moral, and then ideological and then divisive means of divide and conquer.

Reply addressees: @liberaequa @EPoe187