Liv- Going to blame this one on ‘movement’ women too, Liv: 1) women select (even

Liv-

Going to blame this one on ‘movement’ women too, Liv:
1) women select (even in their own children) for socialization and manipulability producing infantilization.
2) women in education and workplace select for non-adversarialism producing men absent adversarialism.
3) subsequently men select for non-adversarial women.
4) women supply non-adversarialism for revenue extraction from males.
5) women continue hyperconsumption and extraction, while men abandon production and hypercapitalization and defense of the commons: it’s very cheap to be a male, because given fire, tools, something to hunt, and a few friends we’re generally happpy. While women’s acquisitiveness is endless.
6) so, the intersextual market equilibrium is preserved.

Why? You (Liv) as an outlier aside, the cognitively female select for non-regulation, hyperconsumption, and status by irresponsibility for commons and capitalization (which would produce conflict) and seek resources by extraction. Conversely the cognitively masculine select for regulation, production and capitalization, and status by responsibilty for commons and capitalization (despite producing conflict).

Poison the well and you get this behavior. It’s deterministic. And it’s obvious.

The market should correct. But we’re going to have a population collapse before it does, and that means an end to all our redistributive programs, and an spiral toward antisocial behavior.

Reply addressees: @Liv_Boeree