You are right of course. But again, a significant component of my work (as an ep

You are right of course.
But again, a significant component of my work (as an epistemologist) is the evolution of (forensics of, archeology of) human truth and deciet. And much of what we learn from that study is humbling, offensive, or humiliating.
So, while we do know the origin sequence
female > jewish > abrahamic-sequence > marxist-sequence, the marxist sequence starts in the french rejection of anglo empiricism in pursuit of secular catholic utopianism and authoritarianism. In other words the french invented every primary lie upon which socialism is constructed, and while the germans produced the formal means of ‘pseudoscientific’ (secular rationalist) argument that was adopted by the jews (marx to frankfurt to woke), the french spread rousseau, the ‘anti-anglo-empirical’ ‘so called’ enlightenment. And postmodernism itself is a war on truth itself.
So while france has always been the enemy of europe due to her effete vanity, given the disproportionate quality of french agrarian land, the french revolution occurred because it was the most backward government in europe – not something that can be said of the monarchies. And the consequence of napoleon destroying europe, and ending the holy roman empire’s ‘market for polities’ that IS the core of european tradition, caused the greater germanic peoples to have to restore herself which we see with german unification and the subsequent tragedy of the first world war.

Reply addressees: @la_chatte_verte @FernandoGLV1212