You are mistaken. Though it is not uncommon that those unfamiliar with the scien

You are mistaken. Though it is not uncommon that those unfamiliar with the scientific method haven’t learned yet.
Given the hierarchy of certainty:
unknown > incomprehensible > undecidable > possibly true > false.
(a) all premises are contingent
(b) so justificationism is false
(c) so all logic is falsificationary
(d) so all truth claims must satisfy survival from adversarial competition, consisting of tests of: realism, categorical identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice (ethical), and fully accounted, within stated limits, and within the limits of restitutabilty. Because one cannot make a truth claim without satisfying those criteria.

In other words:
A mathematical proof tells us that something is possible.
An argumentative proof tells us only that all alternatives are eliminated.
A testimonial truth tells us only that something is testifiable given the knowledge available.
All other truth claims ARE LIES.

And yes, as far as I know, I understand this as well or better than anyone living or dead. And almost certainly anyone at all. 😉

Reply addressees: @RocMurdoch @AdvInteritus @KUHoopes @W9746024628651 @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa