PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION However, should you defect by disassociation or em

PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION
However, should you defect by disassociation or emigration that’s just fine. However, if you try to engage in crime, resistance, rebellion, or revolution whether by free riding, fraud, rent seeking, privatization of commons/socialization of losses into commons, corruption, sedition, treason, or war, then of course, you’re engaging in irreciprocity and can be … well, let’s say ‘corrected or removed’.

#NLIGlossary

Reply addressees: @JohannNetram @TheAutistocrat


Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 16:39:24 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679530979650568192

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

PROPORTIONALITY: If in any given reciprocal exchange the benefit I obtain in proportion to your benefit is insufficient to continue cooperation – ie: disproportionate – then my incentive is to defect to a different individual group or polity with which to cooperate.
Proportionality is a limit beyond which one’s interests to defect increase, until defection by disassociation, emigration, crime, resistance(sedition), rebellion(treason), or revolution(war).

#NLIglossary

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *