Are they strategic disasters? Do you know what our strategy was? (PeterZ does it

Are they strategic disasters? Do you know what our strategy was? (PeterZ does it at least half justice, but without the historical context, because I don’t see PeterZ understanding the reason for the west vs the rest). Or for that matter, was Vietnam a strategic disaster? And is that why republican voters revolt against them? Sure some percent do. It’s certainly not a majority opinion. But isn’t it that they are letting the left expand into all our institutions, holding out christian and conservative optimism, and doing nothing to resist the march through the institutions, immigration, multiculturalism, export of heartland industries, and embracing the global financialists over the nationalists?

The disasters weren’t foreign they were domestic.

Because the postward government converted the domestic imperial government dreated by the civil war, to a global imperial government – even if one of good will and nature.

We’ve destroyed the high trust polity, and the relative homogeneity of the culture, necessary for political cohesion and restored the original demand for independent states that the federal government wasd formed under, in imitation of the holy roman empire, and european history itself, because our civilzation’s strategy as a minority on the edge of the bronze age, cannot tolerate large power distance.

Reply addressees: @BeauBalentine @PeterZeihan