“WE MUST COMPROMIZE BETWEEN SEXES ON REALS NOT FEELZ” His Criticism: –“It’s not

“WE MUST COMPROMIZE BETWEEN SEXES ON REALS NOT FEELZ”

His Criticism:
–“It’s not delayed gratification it’s overall prioritization. On the right, they value, surplus/patience, and well on the left they see the comparison/competition game zero sum. Different priorities, and group dynamics equals priority polarization, polity, polarization. Patience is a virtue but instinct is what saves your life in a pinch. Being reactionary, in the sense that you would be willing to throw, the first punch is why this trait would be adaptive. Being calculated is not smart if you are surrounded by insurgence and your only hope for survival is to put on the warpaint and start collecting scallops. The salmon in left field surrounded. They feel patriarchical oppressed. Femininity is acting out of instinct. Femininity is acting out of instinct and calling that behavior irrational is just stupid. When you have to impose rule of law, by force it is not natural law. You can’t have natural selection without sexual selection. You can’t have order without achieving a consensus of the sexes. The constant demonization of the feminine is so childish.”— Scott

My Response:

As usual, I’m using the terms from the sciences: psychological research, behavioral economics, and law. And how we must develop maturity by developing maturity (agency, responsibility) by self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-determination to engage in reciprocity (cooperation), and how to preserve reciprocity at social, economic, political, and strategic (international) scale.

You are confusing the meaning of terms:

1) prioritization (rational) with time preference and delayed gratification (instinctual).

2) reasonableness (justification of impulse, instinct) with rationality (rational agency)

3) infantile non-rational instinctive impulse in time vs mature, mindful agency over time (time preference).

4) Natural Selection by Instinct and Impulse (in time) vs Natural Selection by evidence and prediction (over time).

5) And you are doing so to avoid the responsibility of maturity (agency, responsibility)

6) And by doing so, demonstrating that if true (impulsive, non-rational, infantilized, irresponsible), then these are not people competent for participatory government, participation on juries, or bearing responsibility for regulation of behavior in the commons.

7) And you’re evading the difference between the sexes as evolutionary exchange between men responsible for defense, territory, resources, and attention (priority in resource allocation) in exchange for sex, care, the work of food preparation, affection, and the resulting sex differences in instinct: males responsible for defense, order, hierarchy (speed of action and coordination), space, resources, and yes their ‘women’, and female’s responsibility for herself, herself when vulnerable during pregnancy in particular, herself when vulnerable because of her children, and the vulnerability of her children, and the disproportionate caloric demands between men versus women and their children. The result is that males and females differ by systematizing over time, responsibility and risk for defense, order, resources, scarcity, and intuition to model and predict space-time-resources-tools over time, vs female irresponsibility for those political assets and limiting herself to responsibility in-time to care for her (50% or higher death rate) children, by the extension of her (non-rational) intuition to cover that of her children. So the sex difference is reducible to differences in responsibility in time.

8) Justification of the feminine is the justification of the infantilized, and justification of the infantilization is advocacy for degeneracy, and leftism (the feminine) is the political means of advocating degeneracy and devolution – because what is leftism?

Leftism is feminine: the evasion of responsibility for self-regulation and other-regulation, for the purpose of avoiding the conflict that arises from attempting to ‘adult’ (mature) others sufficiently for advanced civilization, and in particular for participatory government. The feminine vote left more than the masculine precisely because they seek evasion of responsibility for private and common. And the crisis of the age, like the crisis of the ancient world, is due to the introgression of a feminine cult (Christianity (Abrahamic sequence) -> Marxist-to-woke Sequence), which denies the four sets of laws of nature: the physical (scarcity), the behavioral (acquisition, self interest, envy), the evolutionary (mutation, load, regression to the mean, class hierarchy, and necessity of natural selection), and formal Sciences (the logics we use to explain each of the other three sciences).

So quite the opposite. The crisis of the age is the ongoing attempt to integrate women, immigrants and semitic (slave, Jewish) civilization’s philosophy into aristocratic European civilization’s maximization of individual responsibility – just as Rome(aristocratic, European) did attempt to integrate women, immigrants, and slaves, using Jewish civilization’s philosophy: a religion of false promise of freedom from responsibility by claiming virtue in that irresponsibility, to be awarded after death.

We will, (and my work serves this purpose) modify our law to end female antisocial, anti-economic, and anti-political behavior and those who will prey on it by offering false promises of freedom from responsibility and ignoring the four domains of the laws of the universe. Or we will suffer the fate of every other civilization that has granted women the opportunity for political participation: extermination, or every other civilization that has adopted the feminine (Islam) – which has destroyed the seven great civilizations of the ancient world, their arts, letters, technology, wisdom, and reduced them to dysgenic stagnation unable to adapt to modernity.

So not only don’t I err. I’m explaining the cause of the crisis of the age as a failure to domesticate women into responsibility necessary for a participatory economy and government – both of which require responsibility and the demand for responsibility regardless of our instincts and intuitions to avoid responsibility and remain ‘children’ at all times.

I don’t make the laws of nature. I do, however, write the laws that prohibit lying about them.

Cheers