I’ll just run through this briefly because I’m tired. Education in aristotelian

I’ll just run through this briefly because I’m tired.

Education in aristotelian sciences should improve capacity by one standard deviation. But (g) doesn’t change – it’s biological. IQ tests are now capable of distinquishing between (fluid) neural performance and demonstrated intelligence (crystallized) and between culture neutral and culture specific, where older tests weren’t.

The increase you are talking about is the flynn effect. This is largely a correction in the health of the underclasses, combined with a marginal shift in the improvement of reason by moving from ancient discrete knowledge to european scientific systemic knowledge.

The flynn effect is reversing due largely to declining gene pools and declining pressure for performance in school systems to minimize inequality (or at least feelings of it.)
This applies to all groups. The ratios remain the same between the races no matter what we do.

Evolution followed a simple path with four speciation events and a subsequent set of hybridization events. In this sense despite the discomvort with it, our races are subspecies that adapted to local environment. The direction of our adaptation was neotenic. And the racies represent a spectrom of neotenic evolution out of africa to extremes in western europe and eastern asia.

Current knolwedge of Speciation events: African(RiftValley) > South Eurasian(Dry Persian Gulf) > Hybrids(Everywhere) > European(European Forests) > East Asia(Tibetan plains).

The hybridization events are numerous and small but the major events are due to the agrarian revolution and expansion. Prior to that event all races were as different as europeans and east asians.

If I err here anywhere it’s because I should be sleeping not trying to draw from memory when I’m tired. lol

Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307