Well, though I personally would prefer to support you that’s not my job. My job,

Well, though I personally would prefer to support you that’s not my job. My job, like the supreme court’s job is decidability: judgment.
The reality is that all variation from a nuclear family and the intergenerational production of children capable of the high psychological emotional cost of the western group strategy of maximizing individual responsibility – poses a cost upon others. So what you do in private is your biz and no one else’s.
But the minute you (collectively) tried to normalize your behavior especially by exposing our children to it, you committed one of the most heinous crimes the people paying those high costs will retaliate against.

You don’t have rights.
People create rights legislatively.
Then they distribute rights legislatively and normatively.
Then enforce them judicially.
And you and I benefit from those rights responsibilities and inalienations in the aggregate if not in the particular.

And one of those rights, obligations and inalienations is the inalienability of the responsibility to not expose children to hazard while they are developing – leaving them as you – to a fully informed adult decision.

Specifically, because any such action as ‘transitioning’ someone under full adulthood (25), violates the law liability by violation of warrantability and restitutability.

Intergenerational families, capable of Western high responsibility and high trust, despite the psychological and emotional costs of self-regulation of impulse, are costly and productive. People who don’t produce intergenerational families capable of that same, are just a dead weight cost on those families. And they have every rational incentive to prevent your “selfish” imposition of costs upon their production for the common good.

Cheers.
Good Luck In Your Journey

Reply addressees: @DonKnowles3 @JessVonMiqobutt @JessicaInsanity @RyanShead