Yes, because when we refer to “The Method”, we’re referring to producing sequenc

Yes, because when we refer to “The Method”, we’re referring to producing sequences of terms as measurements by the process of ‘disambiguation by enumeration, operationalization, aversarial competition, and serialization’, thereby creating a discreet definition of a term.

Science consists of the means of producing testifiable testimony by production of falsifiable operations. Scientific statesments contain two properties: the formula (description) and search criteria (context).

There are four sciences: the physical (before state), behavioral (during state), evolutionary (after state), and the formal science (the logics) we describe those states with.

All four sciences are constructable from the one first principle (first law) of the ternary logic of evolutionary computation by the defeat of entropy by the concentration of energy consisting of positive, negative charges in stable persistent organizations.

All language consitsts of measurements of levels of ambiguous to unambiguous precision, using the same rule of evolutionary computation by continous recursive disambiguation of ambiguity into meaning: agreement (or not): “stable relations”

Ergo language is just an extension of the same rules that all the rest of the universe operates by – because thats how our neurons operate, because that’s how molecules operate – etc.

The “grammars”, from unambiuous (math) to ambiguous(deception) consists of paradigms (permissible dimensions), vocabulary, and syntax for communication by some measurment wiether precise, imprecise, or associative, or misleading.

Natural Law = The science, and logic of cooperation (non conflict) by the production of a universally commensurable value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, and logic of decidability.

We use the term natural law because it completes the aristotelian project of the same name. And is the foundation behind the common, concurrent law of europeans and british and american constitutions in particular.

We have merely ‘scienced’ that law, and plugged holes in that constitution by doing so.

This completes the wilsonian synthesis of the unification of the sciences.

So our work is quite important – on the scale of the Darwinian Revlution.

And social media was one of the most useful research tools because we can ‘experiement’ with language and behavior cheaply and quickly by the collection of demonstrated (good) rather than reported (bad) behavior.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @justinmchase