FAILURE OF DUE DILIGENCE BY SNOPES AND WHY IT OCCURS: Under the common law of to

FAILURE OF DUE DILIGENCE BY SNOPES AND WHY IT OCCURS:
Under the common law of tort, you are responsible for the production of a hazard, by a failure of due diligence against that hazard. The fact that the USA has been extraordinarily tolerant of hazarding and defamation, was due to the relative difficulty in transmission of information, and the relative ability of competition to counterbalance such claims.

So yes, snopes failed due diligence against misleading the audience, and in doing so creating a defamatory tort against musk’s organization starlink. And yes the left enagaes in serial (rolling) false accusation using suggestion in lieu of due diligence, precisely because we have not yet restored the common law against doing so with updated legislation.

Our organization works to restore (ad the court is doing elsewhere) the natural, common, concurrent law, of liability for failure of due diligence in speech, that could lead to inference and especially defamation, which is in fact the technique snopes (and all leftist organizations) practice.

And yes I am an expert and like the most expert individual living and working to day on differences in lying, and how to reverse these methods of lying and denying through law.

Because we know that the entire mental framework of the left, like marxism and abrahamic religion before hand, is an expression of the female instinct, makes use of double standards and special pleading, evades all responsibiity possible, and never engages in truthful reciprocal exchange, nor self regulatory behavior to do so.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @deesemonster @ModelYManiac @snopes @Starlink