ANSWERING THE IS-OUGHT PROBLEM – HARD BUT SIMPLE Q: CURT: “Considering what I in

ANSWERING THE IS-OUGHT PROBLEM – HARD BUT SIMPLE
Q: CURT: “Considering what I interpret as your claim to some form of moral realism and you have Hume on your reading list do you have an article on your solution to the Is–ought problem?”

Good (Great) Question

Simple version:
1) Hume was partly correct in that induction doesn’t exist.
2) Popper was partly more correct with falsification and justification doesn’t exist.
3) My work relies on the completion of the falsificationary program, demonstrating that all logic is and can only be falsificationary (falsifying the alternatives), with truth candiates surviving:
|Decidability|: incomprehensible > undecidable > possibly True or Reciprocal > False or Irreciprocal
4) Therefore the is-ought problem isn’t one, but another fallacy of justificationism (a derivation of ‘mathiness’.)
5) As such, we can only falsify the untestifiable (false), and irreciprocal (criminal, unethical, immoral, seditious, treasonous) objectively, and as such, all claims of preference (individual) or good (collective) are statements of preference in a market competition for the scarce cooperation and resources to bring them about, with evolutionary consequences performing falsification of our theories of the preferential and good.
6) We achieve this method of falsification by completing epistemic testifiability and the hierarchy of first principles of the universe across all domains, resulting in universal decidability of testifiability (truthful and reciprocal) and decidability independent of opinion or context. And no you will not understand all of that any more easily than you will understand any other STEM subject because it is the unification of the fields, and most similar to a merger of mathematics, cognitive science, economics, and law. ie: it’s somewhat hard. As hard as any other STEM subject.

I hope this helps.
Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @NorseJarl @Plinz


Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 21:12:07 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670902303354679296

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670898891737235456

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *