Great question. (a) oddly enough I don’t argue it I just assume it (b) because I

Great question.
(a) oddly enough I don’t argue it I just assume it
(b) because I HAVE written a lot about “genetic pacification” (capital punishment) and soft eugenics.
So it’s an argument I’ve included a spot for in the law but it’s so obvious that I haven’t devoted time to writing it yet.
If you think it’s valuable I will. But fundamentally we need to do a LOT of it – as long as it’s for repeat offenders and the evidence isn’t coincidental (beyond reasonable doubt) but incontestable.

Reply addressees: @FlorianRose_