Q: “CURT: ARE WE DUE FOR NEW DISCOVERIES IN PHYSICS?” I’m fairly sure we are abo

Q: “CURT: ARE WE DUE FOR NEW DISCOVERIES IN PHYSICS?”
I’m fairly sure we are about to experience a reformation by restoring ‘physics’ (physicality, discreetness) to the disciple of physics, which as been mired in mathiness (continuousness). Yes.

This reformation will eliminate the many falsehoods that evolved in the field during the 20th century. And it will change our explanations of what we observe in the cosmos from a little to a lot. However, in terms of discoveries, as far as I know, we are still stuck with the observation (measurement) problem.

And while much of this ‘mathiness’ has been nonsense, some clues did arise from the nonsense. And those clues suggest that there are two more layers of precision that produce the quantum background.

And personally, I find all of this science of different scales of complexity something between awe-inspiring and terrifyingly creepy. 😉 Because the very small is very small, and the very big is very big, and while we’re incredibly complex compared to the observable universe itself, we’re sort of ‘not much’ by comparison.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @ScottClaremonty