Understood. But… presumes “our support” is sufficient in the absence of the nu

Understood. But… presumes “our support” is sufficient in the absence of the numbers of other factions, when thats not evident at all. Presumes voting is sufficient for resistance or reform. Overweights christians when they have traditionally been biased to the left, and would still be if leftism wasnt hedonic. Presumes the opposition canceling outlying factions isnt sufficient to constrain outliers. Presumes leaving the door open for the people who are naive or silly, under stress, and just advocating for what they understand, isnt valuable given they will follow any momentum, and are the most likely to show up. James is just repeating the marxist means of critique. I dont see solutions out of him or anyone else. As far as I know my org has the only “not amateurish” solutions. In other words I advocate defeat of people’s bad ideas but dont alienate people by ridicule and insult, when they are a resource.
cheers.

Reply addressees: @stonepawz @ConceptualJames