Q: “CURT; ARE YOU A [Insert Epistemic Method Here]?” No. As an epistemologist, I

Q: “CURT; ARE YOU A [Insert Epistemic Method Here]?”

No. As an epistemologist, I’m a falsificationist(all logic is falsificationary, and justification like induction doesn’t exist), a computationalist (only operationalism is causal), moral realist (reciprocity is fully decidable), and a testimonialist (performative truth, what can one testify to).

Realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice, complete by fully accounted within stated limites.

Think of it as a merger between Falsification, Computation, Intuitionism, and Performative Truth.

AFAIK. That’s what it means to do science. Everything else isn’t science, because science evolved from european law, and the criteria for testimony.

Hence why I place decidability then law above all other discplines in the hierarchy of disciplines.