I’m interested in science, I know the science, and I know what science requires

I’m interested in science, I know the science, and I know what science requires – especially given that science is just the application of testimony outside of the courtroom which is why Europeans developed reason, logic, empiricism, science and rule of law. But you’re unaware that my specialization is cross disciplinary in cognitive science, epistemology, computation and linguistics, economics and law, where the net result is that I end up specializing in sex class and cultural differences in lying. And you’re lying by a failure of due diligence. You can’t defend against due diligence unless you understand your biases (mine are anglo libertarian) and therefore use extra due diligence against the expression of those biases. You clearly don’t understand the term science (vs empiricism) or mathematics (vs computation), or the epistemological necessity of constructive logic vs correlative description. And if you don’t understand those differences then you should before you render and opinion.

Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @KingBoru_ @UsingLyft