“Q: WHAT MESSAGE ARE YOU STAYING ON?” The message I’m ‘Staying On’ is that weste

“Q: WHAT MESSAGE ARE YOU STAYING ON?”
The message I’m ‘Staying On’ is that western government, especially the english invention of the modern rule of law state, creates a market between the classes of different responsibilities for the voluntary exchange and production of commons otherwise not producible by private means – either because of conflict, competing ideas, or cost.

As such, when adding a new ‘class’ to the ‘market’ (voting pool) the solution is to add a new ‘house’ for that class. Forcing the need for consent between houses. This is called “concurrency” in legislation, just as we use house, senate, and electoral college to determine concurrency in elections. As such we live in a concurrent democracy not a majority democracy for good reasons. This prevents a race to the bottom under mass democracy. – which is what we have seen, especially since the introduction of women. Why? women seek irresponsibility the way men seek responsibility.

This is not to claim that this is the only solution. It’s to explain that the only means of decidability on investments in the commons by political means is some organized market that is most resistant to responsibilities for the capital that results from social, economic, and political orders.

Instead, it provides a basic framework for solving the problem of divergent interests between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and yes, races.

Because the alternative, universally is either a race to the bottom resulting in authoritarianism or the production of authoritarianism regardless.