Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, becaus

Humorously rather obvious that none of that follows from anything I said, because you’re asserting pretenst of knowledge, understanding, and competency by demonstrating the opposite.

Instead, given sex differences in cognitive bias, by difference in:

female in-time empathizing, mimimization of and evasion of responsibility for the commons, and hypreconsumtion as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to magical thinking (demand)

-vs-

male over-time systematizing maximization of and competition for responsibility for the commons and capitalization as means of status seeking, and as such are biased to empirical thinking (supply)

then:

The sphere of competency of the sexes, including genetic in origin, developmental, and self-selection bias, is demonstrated in the consequence of sex differences in self-evaluation, moral-intuition, and behavior in speech, social, economic, and most importantly political consequences. Where women vote irresponsibility and men for responsibility. Or at least women vote irresponsibly until they have three or more children;

And where, given that men create liberty by physical mechanical and institutional means, lead in the creation of it, and women follow in opportunity as a consequence, so laws that constrain male antisocial behavior are later followed by laws that constrain female antisocial behavior;

And given male antisocial behavior is intolerable at both individual and political scale, but female antisocial behavior is (at present) tolerated at individual and political scale, we have used the law to suppress male antisocial behavior, but not female antisocial behavior.

And as such we are currently running an extraordinary experiment in tolerance for female antisocial behavior at interpersonal, familial, social, economic, and political scale that is leading to a choice to repeat the collapse of every other civilization that has tolerated female antisocial behavior (that they call moral) at political scale, or we will (as expected and as I work toward) outlaw female antisocial behavior in the present as we have in the past under the common law that imposed equal constraints on men and women for their sex differences in antisocial behavior.

Every major failure of legislation and policy that has led to the cultural collapse we call the culture war has only been possible under ‘positive law’ and the introgression of women into the voting pool.

Now you won’t refute this because you can’t.

You can sperg out about it. You can outrage about it. You can ad hominem about it. But it’s true. Sorry. Every good has resulted from the prosperity made possible by the sequence of scientific, technological, and medical revolutions men created. Every single one. And almost exclusively european men. In each of the steel, iron, and bronze ages of mankind.

Democracy is a privilege of rule of law of the natural law of reciprocal (male) insurance of self determination by self determined means by soverignty in demonstrated intersets and reciprocity in display word and deed.

And primary among those is the obligation to speak the truth regardless of cost (reals over feels) and women can’t appear to do so in sufficient numbers to maintain the privileges that result from adhering to those criteria of natural law.

It’s not even clear that most women are capable of sufficient ‘disconnect’ between emotions and evidence to make rational adult thought on problems of scale.

And yes, that’s – the science. Sorry.
We’ve been trying to find just one woman – just ONE – that’s capable of the marginal genius that men provide with every generation, specifically because of the disconnection and systematizing of the male mind. And no matter how hard we try, we can’t find one.

But we can find a lot of women who believe in magical thinking, manifestation, astrology, and oppression narratives as a means of evading the responsibility of rational thought.