Men lie systemically. Women lie as I stated: denial, evasion, suggestion, undermining. The data in this paper does not rely on testing lying, it relies on confidence in limited knowledge. The study measures sex differences in confidence that an individual can solve a mathematical problem. So the author of the test (a male) essentially lied himself by systemic means by failing due diligence by failing to account for the most obvious answer.
I can do this all day. It’s my job. And I’m the principle author of explaining the disambiguation of lying into sex differences.
So why did you claim to understand this study as evidence when you lacked the competence to do so? The same reason as the boys in the study. But then you added female invective in addition for the purpose of reputation undermining.
We are all very simple ‘bots’ really.
We just require the illusion of greater agency than we have becuase we must maintain sufficient optimism to act in a kaleidic universe of uncertainty. And evolution provided us with that confidence. Otherwise we would suffer the consoiusness of the harshness of life.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 12:00:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646845817335037953
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646781819809935360
Leave a Reply